Digimorph, An NSF Digital Library at UT Austin, Texas
help
DigiMorph
Browse the Library by:
 Scientific Names
 Common Names
 What's New ?
 What's Popular?
Learn More
Overview Pages
A Production of

Alces alces, Moose
Mr. Andrew Clifford - Ohio University, currently Brown University
Lawrence Witmer - Ohio University
Alces alces
Click for help
skull
Click for more information

Ohio University Vertebrate Collections (OUVC 9742)

Image processing: Mr. Ryan Ridgely
Publication Date: 01 Apr 2004

ITIS TNS Google MSN

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2004. Case studies in novel narial anatomy: 2. The enigmatic nose of moose (Artiodactyla: Cervidae: Alces alces). Journal of Zoology 262:339-360.

moose
moose

The facial region of moose Alces alces is highly divergent relative to other cervids and other ruminants. In particular, the narial region forms an expanded muzzle or proboscis that overhangs the mouth. The nose of moose provides a case study in the evolution of narial novelty within a phylogenetically well-resolved group (Cervidae). The function of the nasal apparatus of moose remains enigmatic, and new hypotheses are proposed based on our anatomical findings. Head specimens of moose and outgroup taxa were subjected to medical imaging (CT scanning), vascular injection, gross anatomical dissection, gross sectioning, and skeletonization.

Moose noses are characterized by highly enlarged nostrils accompanied by specialized musculature, expanded nasal cartilages, and an increase in the connective-tissue pad serving as the termination of the alar fold. The nostrils are widely separated, and the rhinarium that encircles both nostrils in outgroups is reduced to a tiny central patch in moose. The dorsal lateral nasal cartilage is modified to form a pulley mechanism associated with the levator muscle of the upper lip. The lateral accessory nasal cartilage is enlarged and serves as an attachment site for musculature controlling the aperture of the nostril, particularly the lateralis nasi, the apical dilatators, and the rectus nasi. Bony support for narial structures is reduced. Moose show greatly enlarged nasal cartilages, and the entire osseocartilaginous apparatus is relatively much larger than in outgroups. The nasal vestibule of moose is very large and houses a system of three recesses: one rostral and one caudal to the nostrils, and one associated with the enlarged fibrofatty alar fold. As a result of the expanded nasal vestibule, osseous support for the nasal conchae (i.e. turbinates) has retracted caudally along with the bony nasal aperture. The nasoturbinate and its mucosal counterparts (dorsal nasal concha and rectal fold) are reduced. The upturned maxilloturbinate, however, is associated with an enlarged ventral nasal concha and alar fold. Moose are the only species of cervid with these particular characteristics, indicating that this anatomical configuration is indeed novel. Although functional hypotheses await testing, our anatomical findings and published behavioural observations suggest that the novel narial apparatus of moose probably has less to do with respiratory physiology than with functions pertaining specifically to the nostrils. The widely separated and laterally facing nostrils may enhance stereolfaction (i.e. extracting directional cues from gradients of odorant molecules in the environment), but other attributes of narial architecture (enlarged cartilages, specialized musculature, recesses, fibrofatty pads) suggest that this function may not have been the evolutionary driving force. Rather, these attributes suggest a mechanical function, namely, an elaborated nostril-closing system.

About the Species

This specimen (OUVC 9742) is a subadult female collected by the Department of Natural Resources in Newfoundland, Canada. It was killed by accidental collision with a vehicle followed by euthanasia by gunshot; this is evident from the bullet holes in the skull roof and preorbital regions on the left side, and the high-density (bright) bullets and bone fragments visible in the ventral portions of the back of the head.

About this Specimen

The specimen was scanned (120.0 kV, 200.0 mA, 5 mm slice thickness, bone algorithm) on 21 May 2002 on a GE HiSpeed Fx-i Helical CT Scanner at O'Bleness Memorial Hospital, Athens, Ohio with the assistance of Heather D. Mayle, RT. The head was then injected (according to procedures modified from Sedlmayr & Witmer, 2002) and re-scanned on 23 May 2002, using the same equipment, settings and personnel. CT data were exported in DICOM format using eFilm (v. 1.5.3, Merge eFilm, Tonoto). Analysis and postprocessing employed eFilm (v. 1.8.3) and Amira (v. 3.0, TGS, Inc., San Diego). Quicktime (v. 6.0, Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino) was used to make the movies.

About the
Scan

Literature

Boas, J. E. V., and S. Paulli. 1908. The elephant's head: studies in the comparative anatomy of the organs of the head of the Indian elephant and other mammals. Part I. Copenhagen: Folio, Gustav Fisher.

Bubenik, A. B. 1997. Evolution, taxonomy, and morphophysiology. In Ecology and Management of the North American Moose:77-123. Franzmann, Albert W. and Schwartz, Charles C. (Eds.). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Breda, M. 2001. The holotype of Cervalces gallicus (Azzaroli, 1952) from Sénesè (Haute-Loire, France) with nomenclatural implication and taxonomical-phylogenetic accounts. Riv. Italiana Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 107:439-449.

Churcher, C. S., and J. D. Pinsof. 1988. Variation in the antlers of North American Cervalces (Mammalia: Cervidae): Review of new and previously recorded specimens. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 7:373-397.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2001. The narial anatomy of hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) with respect to other Carnivora. Annual Meeting of the Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Chicago, Illinois. American Zoologist 40:976.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2002a. Proboscis evolution in Mammalia: preliminary studies. Annual Meeting of the Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Anaheim, California. American Zoologist 41:153.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2002b. Not all noses are hoses: an appraisal of proboscis evolution in mammals. Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Norman, Oklahoma. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22(Suppl. to 3):66A.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2003. Nasal structures in moose (Cervidae: Alces). Annual Meeting of the Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:137-138.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. 2004. Case studies in novel narial anatomy: 2. The enigmatic nose of moose (Artiodactyla: Cervidae: Alces alces). Journal of Zoology, London 262:339-360.

Clifford, A. B., and L. M. Witmer. in review. Case studies in novel narial anatomy: 3. Structure and function of the nasal cavity of saiga (Artiodactyla: Bovidae: Saiga tatarica). Journal of Zoology, London.

Dawes, J. D. K. 1952. The course of the nasal airstreams. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 66:583-593.

Flerow, K. K. 1952. Genus Alces Gray (1821) - Elk. In Fauna of U.S.S.R.: Mammals. I: Musk Deer and Deer: 166-192.

Franzmann, A. W. 1981. Alces alces. Mammalian Species 154:1-7.

Frey, R., and R. R. Hofmann. 1996. Skull, proboscis musculature and preorbital gland in the saiga antelope and Guenther's dikdik (Mammalia, Bovidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 235:183-199.

Geist, V. 1999. Moose: behavior, ecology, conservation. Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press.

Getty, R. 1975. Sisson and Grossman's The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. I: General, equine, ruminant. (5th edn). Philadelphia: W. B. Sauders Company.

Ghoshal, N. G. 1985. Thermoregulatory role of the cranial circulation in cerebral temperature control. Vlaams Diergeneesk. Tijdschr. 54:246-261.

Groves, C. P., and P. Grubb. 1987. Relationships of living deer. In Biology and Management of the Cervidae: 21-59. Wemmer, Christen M. (Ed.). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Heptner, V. G., A. A. Nasimovich, and A. G. Bannikow. 1988. Mammals of the Soviet Union. I: Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and the National Science Foundation.

Hofmann, R. R. 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443-457.

Huber, E. 1930. Evolution of facial musculature and cutaneous field of trigeminus, part I. Quarterly Review of Biology 5:133-188.

Jacobi, A. 1921. Die rüsselbildung bei säugertieren der gegenwart und vorzeit. Jena. Z. Naturwiss. 57:199-218.

Johnsen, H. K., and L. P. Folkow. 1988. Vascular control of brain cooling in reindeer. American Journal of Physiology 254:R730-R739.

Karns, P. D. 1997. Population distribution, density, and trends. In Ecology and Management of the North American Moose: 125-140. Franzmann, Albert W. & Schwartz, Charles C. (Eds.). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Kobal, G., S. Van Toller, and T. Hummel. 1989. Is there directional smelling? Experientia 35:130-132.

Kuhnen, G. 1997. Selective brain cooling reduces respiratory water loss during heat stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 118:891-895.

Langman, V. A., G. M. O. Maloiy, K. Schmidt-Nielson, and R. C. Schroter. 1979. Nasal heat exchange in the giraffe and other large mammals. Respiratory Physiology 37:325-333.

Meinertz, T. 1955. Das facialisgebeit beim Elch (Cervus alces). Morphologische Jahrbuch 96:523-598.

Miquelle, D. G. 1991. Are moose mice? The function of scent urination in moose. American Naturalist 138:460-477.

Moore, W. J. 1981. The Mammalian Skull. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Negus, V. 1958. The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livinstone, Ltd.

Nickel, R., A. Schummer, E. Seiferle, J. Frewein, H. Wilkens, and K.-H. Wille. 1986. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. I: The Locomotor System of the Domestic Mammals. Siller, W. G. & Stokoe, W. M. (trans.). Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey.

Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. 1994. Ithaca: World Assoc. Vet. Anat.

Novacek, M. J., A. R. Wyss, and M. C. McKenna. 1988. The major groups of eutherian mammals. In The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Volume 2: Mammals: 31-71. Benton, M. J. (ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World. (6th ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Papp, M. J. 2000. A critical appraisal of buccal soft-tissue anatomy in ornithischian dinosaurs. Ohio University Master's Thesis. Ohio University, Athens. 229pp.

Paulli, S. 1900. Über die Pneumaticität des Schädels bei den Säugertieren. Eine morphologische Studie. II. Über die Morphologie des Siebbeins und die der Pneumaticität bei den Ungulaten and Probosciden. Gegenbaurs Morphologische Jahrbuch 28:179-251.

Peterson, R. L. 1978. North American Moose. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Schaller, O. 1992. Illustrated veterinary anatomical nomenclature. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.

Schmidt-Nielsen, K., F. R. Hainsworth, and D. E. Murrish. 1970. Counter-current heat exchange in the respiratory passages: effect on water and heat balance. Respiratory Physiology 9:263-276.

Scott, W. B. 1885. Cervalces americanus, a fossil moose, or elk, from the Quaternary of New Jersey. Proceedings of the Acadamy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 37:174-202.

Sedlmayr, J. C., and L. M. Witmer. 2002. Rapid technique for imaging the blood vascular system using stereoangiography. Anatatomical Record 267:330-336.

Sobel, N., R. M. Khan, A. Saltman, E. V. Sullivan, and J. D. E. Gabrieli. 1999. The world smells different to each nostril. Nature 402:35.

Stoddart, D. M. 1979. External nares and olfactory perception. Experentia 35:1456-1457.

Webb, S. D. 2000. Evolutionary history of New World Cervidae. In Antelopes, Deer, and Relatives: 38-64. Vrba, E. S. & Schaller, G. B. (Eds.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Witmer, L. M. 1995a. The Extant Phylogenetic Bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology:19-33, Thomason, J. J. (Ed.) New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Witmer, L. M. 1995b. Homology of facial structures in extant archosaurs (birds and crocodilians), with special reference to paranasal pneumaticity and nasal conchae. Journal of Morphology 225:269-327.

Witmer, L. M. 2001a. A nose for all reasons. Natural History 110:64-71.

Witmer, L. M. 2001b. Nostril position in dinosaurs and other vertebrates and its significance for nasal function. Science 293:850-853.

Witmer, L. M., S. D. Sampson, and N. Solounias. 1999. The proboscis of tapirs (Mammalia: Perissodactyla): A case study in novel narial anatomy. Journal of Zoology, London 249:249-267.

Literature
& Links

Slice movies optimized for soft tissue.

transverse

sagittal

horizontal



Slice movies with injected arteries.

transverse

sagittal

horizontal



Visualization of nasal airway and skull.

Additional
Imagery

To cite this page: Mr. Andrew Clifford, Lawrence Witmer - Ohio University, 2004, "Alces alces" (On-line), Digital Morphology. Accessed November 27, 2014 at http://digimorph.org/specimens/Alces_alces/.

©2002 - UTCT/DigiMorph Funding by NSF
Hits=33346. Comments to info@digimorph.org